Potentially, yes, but appointing an existing employee as manager requires closer review than passive share ownership.
A registered manager may be authorised to:
Where appropriate, another person may initially be appointed as manager while the employee remains a passive shareholder. This arrangement must reflect reality and should not be used to disguise unauthorised work.
Can the Employee Keep the Existing Visa di lavoro?
Company ownership does not automatically require an individual to cancel an existing employment residence visa and obtain an investor or partner visa. A shareholder may potentially remain sponsored by the current employer.
However, retaining the visa di lavoro does not by itself resolve the question of working for the new company.
Immigration planning should form part of the company-formation decision rather than being addressed only after the licenza is issued.
Should the Employee Obtain an Investor or Visa socio?
Visa categories, eligibility conditions and terminology can differ across jurisdictions. The decision should be based on the person's genuine role rather than on whichever visa appears least expensive.
An employee should read the existing employment contract and applicable workplace policies before establishing a competing or related business.
Relevant provisions may include:
Even where no NOC is requested during costituzione di impresa, an employee may still breach their employment obligations by operating an undisclosed or competing enterprise.
Written consent is particularly valuable where the new business overlaps with the employer's sector, customers, suppliers, geography or services.
EAU labour legislation permits certain post-employment non-compete restrictions where an employee's work gives access to clients or business secrets and where the clause satisfies the applicable requirements.
A contractual clause should not be assumed to be enforceable merely because it uses the words "non-compete." Equally, it should not be ignored without legal review.
A new company creates higher risk where it:
Employees facing a significant restriction should obtain EAU employment-law advice before investing funds or approaching the market.
A person should keep the new company completely separate from the employer's protected information and assets.
The employee should not use:
The employee may have general industry experience, but confidential information belongs to the party legally entitled to it.
Intellectual property can also create disputes. If a product, software system, brand asset or methodology is developed while the person is employed, questions may arise about who owns it. The answer can depend on the employment contract, the nature of the work, how it was created and the applicable intellectual-property law.
A conflict can exist even when the new company does not directly compete with the employer.
Examples include:
Disclosure and independent approval may be required under the employment contract, company policies or regulated-sector rules.
The person should document the nature of the interest and avoid participating in decisions where personal benefit could conflict with duties owed to the employer.
Government and public-sector employees may be subject to separate federal or local human-resources laws, internal codes and conflict-of-interest restrictions.
A government employee may need:
The exact position depends on the government entity and the rules governing the employee's appointment. Written clearance should be obtained before establishing, managing or investing in a business where required.
Additional restrictions can apply to employees working in regulated professions.
Examples may include:
The relevant regulator may control:
A licenza commerciale alone does not replace a professional practising licenza or regulator approval.