Can two companies use the same Ejari 在迪拜?

It is generally unsafe to assume that one Ejari issued in the name of Company A can be submitted unchanged for Company B.

The Ejari normally identifies a particular tenant. If Company B is not named in the underlying contract or supported by an approved sharing, sublease or occupancy arrangement, it may have no documented right to use the premises.

A licensing authority may reject the application where:

The correct solution is not to alter or informally reuse the existing document. It is to establish which approved occupancy structure the licensing authority will accept for the second company.

Both companies carry out work at the same premises. They may have separate rooms, desks, employees, records and signage.

Both licences display the same building and unit address, subject to authority approval.

Both companies are named or otherwise legally recognised under the occupancy 文件, where the landlord and registration system permit it.

A tenancy certificate issued solely to one legal entity is submitted for another entity without a supporting right of occupancy. This is the arrangement most likely to cause licensing or 合规 difficulties.

Two companies may share a location without literally using the same Ejari certificate in the same way. The second company might instead hold an approved sublease, office-sharing permit or business-centre agreement.

Is There One 迪拜-Wide Rule?

A Mainland company licensed through 迪拜's 经济与旅游局 follows the applicable Mainland licensing and premises requirements. Each 自由区 applies its own company and property rules.

A landlord's NOC, for example, may satisfy the property owner but not the licensing authority. Similarly, a licensing authority's preliminary acceptance does not override a lease that prohibits subletting.

迪拜 tenancy law is especially important where Company A is the principal tenant and Company B will occupy part of its office.

Article 24 of 迪拜 Law No. 26 of 2007 provides that, unless the lease states otherwise, a tenant may not assign the use of or sublease the property to a third party without the landlord's written consent.

The law also permits a landlord to seek eviction where a tenant sublets the property or part of it without written approval. 迪拜 Law No. 26 of 2007

Examples include:

Allowing Company B to install signage or receive inspections at Company A's office without approval

Common ownership does not, by itself, eliminate the need for landlord consent or licensing approval. Company A and Company B remain separate legal persons.

Potentially, but only through a structure accepted by the Mainland licensing authority and permitted by the lease and landlord.

The authority may examine:

Possible routes can include:

The fact that both companies are Mainland entities does not guarantee approval.

Common ownership can make an office-sharing application more commercially understandable, but it does not automatically legalise it.

For example, one individual may own:

The companies are still separate legal entities with 单独许可证, liabilities, invoices, employees, bank accounts and tax records.

The authority may request evidence such as:

Related ownership may support the business rationale, but the premises arrangement must still be documented correctly.

A parent and subsidiary may be more likely to have a legitimate operational reason for sharing premises. Nevertheless, each entity should have a documented right to use the address.

A compliant arrangement may require:

If one company pays all rent and charges a portion to the other, the accounting treatment should be documented. Intercompany charges may also constitute related-party transactions for 企业所得税 purposes.

The companies should not merge their accounting merely because they share a location.

Sister companies are entities controlled by the same shareholder or parent. They may be permitted to share premises under an approved related-company or group arrangement.

The authority may want to understand:

An informal statement that both companies "belong to the same owner" is not a substitute for official approval.

Unrelated businesses may occupy the same larger commercial premises in certain approved circumstances, particularly through:

This is usually more difficult where one ordinary operating company rents an office and informally allows another unrelated company to use part of it.

The original tenant should not act as a commercial office provider unless its 执照, lease and property approvals allow it to do so.

An authorised business centre can provide a more structured way for several companies to use the same broader premises.

Each client company may receive:

Businesses should verify:

A business-centre agreement is not automatically interchangeable with a conventional commercial Ejari.

Free Zones commonly offer flexi-desk or co-working options for companies that do not initially require a conventional private office.

These arrangements may support:

Each 自由区 sets its own rules. A flexi-desk issued by one 自由区 generally cannot be assumed to support a company licensed by another 自由区 or a Mainland authority.

A founder with two 自由区 companies may require two separate facility agreements even when both businesses use the same co-working location.

自由区 companies must follow the property rules of their licensing authority.

Some Free Zones recognise:

DMCC, for example, expressly distinguishes physical leased units from business-centre and shared-unit arrangements in its licensing guidance. For conventional leased units, an Ejari number may be mandatory, while approved business centres and shared units may use relevant lease 文件 instead. DMCC 执照-renewal guidance

This illustrates why businesses should not apply one general rule to every 迪拜 自由区.

Can a Mainland Company and 自由区 Company Share an Office?

A 自由区 company is licensed through its 自由区 authority, while a Mainland company is licensed under the Mainland framework. Each company's authority must accept its operating location.

Questions include:

Does the 自由区 permit the company to use that external address?

Does the Mainland authority recognise the proposed occupancy?

Is the building inside or outside the 自由区?

Does the landlord permit both companies?

Can the 自由区 company conduct its licensed activities from that location?

Does the arrangement create or evidence an onshore place of business?

Are 单独许可证, permits or branch arrangements required?

Will the companies have employees working outside the 自由区?

Could the arrangement affect the 自由区 company's tax analysis?

A 自由区 company should not treat a Mainland office address as a routine mailing change without obtaining advice and approval.

Can a 自由区 Company Use a Mainland Company's Ejari?

If the Ejari is solely in the Mainland company's name, the 自由区 company has not independently demonstrated that it is entitled to occupy the premises.

The 自由区 authority may require:

The correct solution depends on the 自由区, activities and commercial arrangement.

A Mainland company cannot assume that a 自由区 office will satisfy Mainland premises requirements.

The premises may be within a jurisdiction where office space is reserved for companies licensed by that 自由区. The 自由区 authority, property owner and Mainland licensing authority would all need to permit the arrangement.

A company seeking this structure should establish:

A residential tenancy should not normally be treated as a substitute for an approved commercial office.

A property must be used consistently with:

迪拜 tenancy law permits eviction where property is used for a purpose different from the purpose for which it was leased or contrary to applicable planning, construction and land-use regulations. 迪拜 tenancy law

Working occasionally from 首页 is not the same as registering a residential unit as the official operational premises of multiple companies.

The practical answer is often that each legal entity needs its own accepted proof of occupancy. That does not always mean two conventional Ejari certificates.

The licensing authority should confirm which form of 文件准备 is required before the companies sign or amend the lease.

Even where sharing is permitted, the premises must be suitable for both businesses.

主管部门 may consider:

A small office that supports one consultancy and one visa may not support two companies and ten employees.

The applicant should not rely on a universal minimum size. Space requirements may differ by authority, building and activity.

If the two companies perform materially different activities, separate premises may be required even when they share ownership.

Certain activities are supervised by 主管部门 in addition to the licensing body.

These regulators may impose dedicated-space, security, privacy, signage, accessibility or inspection requirements.

A general landlord NOC will not replace an industry regulator's approval.

主管部门 may consider:

Sharing one office does not mean the companies share one immigration file. Each company generally maintains its own:

An employee sponsored by Company A should not automatically be treated as an employee of Company B.

Can Employees Work for Both Companies?

A receptionist informally serving both companies may appear straightforward, but the legal employer and the basis for recharging costs should be documented.

A shared address is not automatically unacceptable to a bank. However, it may attract additional questions.

A bank may ask:

Why do the companies use the same address?

Are the 股东 related?

Is the office genuine and operational?

Is the business centre authorised?

Does each company have a valid occupancy agreement?

Are the companies financially and operationally separate?

Which employees belong to each company?

Are transactions expected between the entities?

Is the address used by many unrelated businesses?

Can the bank conduct a site visit?

Is the workspace appropriate for the declared turnover and activity?

Companies should keep available:

Neither Ejari registration nor an office-sharing approval guarantees bank-account acceptance.

Two companies sharing an office remain separate taxable persons unless they form an approved Tax Group or another specific legal treatment applies.

Each company should separately assess:

If Company A pays the rent and charges Company B for office use, the arrangement should be supported by a written agreement and commercially reasonable allocation method.

The existence of common ownership does not allow expenses to be moved freely between entities.

A 自由区 company seeking Qualifying 自由区 Person treatment must meet all applicable statutory conditions. This includes maintaining adequate substance in the relevant 自由区.

FTA guidance explains that adequate substance involves conducting core income-generating activities in the 自由区 and maintaining appropriate assets, qualified employees and operating expenditure in relation to those activities. FTA Guide on 自由区 Persons

A shared office or flexi-desk does not automatically satisfy or fail the substance test. The assessment depends on the company's activities, income and operational facts.

A 自由区 company working substantially from a Mainland office should obtain tax advice rather than assuming its 0% treatment remains unaffected.

Where one company recharges rent, utilities, administrative support or other services to another company, 增值税 consequences may arise.

The companies should consider:

Property approval and tax treatment are separate questions. A valid tax invoice does not make an unauthorised sublease lawful.

Shared costs should be allocated consistently and supported by evidence.

Costs may include:

Possible allocation methods include:

The method should reflect the commercial reality and be applied consistently.

An office arrangement accepted at incorporation may still need to remain valid at renewal.

Problems can arise if:

DMCC, for example, requires relevant lease 文件准备 for 执照 renewal and distinguishes between conventional leased units and approved business-centre or shared-unit arrangements. DMCC renewal requirements

Both companies should monitor their 执照, tenancy and occupancy expiry dates independently.

Some activities or premises may be inspected before or after 执照签发.

Inspectors may check:

The companies should not create misleading signage that makes two separate legal entities appear to be one company.

Separate premises may be preferable where:

The rental saving should be compared with the cost of 执照 rejection, penalties, relocation and operational disruption.

The following 文件 may be requested:

Requirements vary. The 文件 should be prepared only after confirming the route accepted by the relevant 主管部门.

Check its use clause, subletting restrictions, occupancy limits and notice requirements.

Ask each licensing authority which tenancy or sharing 文件 it will accept.

This may be a separate lease, sublease, business-centre agreement or approved office-sharing arrangement.

Collect licences, ownership evidence, floor plans, NOCs and agreements.

Do not move the second company into the premises based only on an informal understanding.

Where required, update the 商业执照 and associated authority records.

Review immigration, 企业所得税, 增值税, banking, customs and regulatory records.

Put rental and service recharges on a defensible contractual and accounting basis.

Keep the lease, Ejari, 执照 and sharing approvals valid throughout occupancy.

Companies remain separate legal persons even when they have identical 股东.

The licensing authority, building management or regulator may require separate approval.

Unauthorised subletting can expose the tenant and subtenant to eviction and claims.

Each company must comply with the applicable employment and immigration framework.

Rent and service recharges between related companies require proper records.

A company's operating address should correspond with its licensing records.

KPM Global Services can assess whether two businesses may legally and practically operate from the same 迪拜 office.

Our support may include:

Approval ultimately rests with the property owner, relevant licensing authority and any other competent regulator.

Yes, in certain approved structures. The lease, landlord, licensing 主管部门, building rules, office size and business activities must all permit the arrangement.

Not automatically. An Ejari issued solely in one company's name does not by itself give another company the right to occupy the premises.

3. Does each Mainland company need its own Ejari?

Each company normally needs independently acceptable evidence of occupancy. This may be a separate Ejari or another approved document such as a sublease, office-sharing permit or authorised business-centre agreement.

Possibly, but common ownership alone is insufficient. The companies may need landlord consent, proof of their relationship and licensing-authority approval.

Potentially. Their corporate relationship may support the request, but each entity still needs a documented and approved right to use the address.

They may be able to do so through an authorised business centre, serviced office, divided unit or approved sublease. Informal desk sharing is risky.

Written landlord consent is normally essential where the arrangement amounts to sharing, assignment or subletting and the original lease does not already permit it.

The arrangement may breach the lease and 迪拜 tenancy law. The landlord may have grounds to seek eviction, subject to the applicable legal 流程.

Not necessarily. The licensing authority, building manager, master developer or sector regulator may require additional approval.

Only where the relevant 自由区, Mainland authority, landlord and property rules permit it. A formal 执照, branch, dual-licensing or office arrangement may be required.

It should not be assumed. The 自由区 property rules and Mainland licensing requirements must both allow the arrangement.

Often, yes, if the business centre is authorised and issues the 文件 required for each company. Activity and visa restrictions may still apply.

Usually, each company requires its own 自由区-approved facility package or agreement. One company's flexi-desk cannot automatically be reused for another entity.

A residential tenancy should not ordinarily be used as commercial premises for two businesses. Property classification, 执照 rules and tenancy restrictions must be respected.

It may. Visa capacity can be connected to facility type, office size and the licensing authority's rules.

Potentially, if the premises and sharing arrangement are approved. Each worker must remain properly sponsored, permitted and employed.

This requires a proper employment, permit, secondment or service arrangement. Sharing an office does not authorise informal dual employment.

A bank may accept it, but can request detailed occupancy, ownership and operational evidence. Account approval remains entirely at the bank's discretion.

The companies remain separate taxable persons unless an approved tax treatment applies. Shared costs and intercompany charges must be documented correctly.

Potentially. A Qualifying 自由区 Person must satisfy adequate-substance and other conditions. The real operating location should be considered in the tax analysis.

That depends on the legal arrangement. A rent or service recharge may be appropriate, but it must be permitted by the lease and properly treated for 增值税, accounting and 企业所得税.

Possibly, where the relevant 主管部门 approve the arrangement and both companies hold acceptable occupancy evidence.

A mailing arrangement does not necessarily satisfy licensing or operational-premises requirements. The authority should approve the precise arrangement.

Common 文件 include both licences, ownership records, the tenancy contract, Ejari, landlord NOC, office-sharing agreement, floor plan and building approval.

It can reduce rent and administrative costs, but only if the arrangement is legally approved. Unauthorised sharing can result in rejection, relocation, renewal problems or tenancy disputes.

Yes. KPM Global Services can review the tenancy, intended activities, company relationship and licensing jurisdictions to identify the most appropriate route.