A multi-shareholder business can generally be established on the Dubaï mainland or in an appropriate Zone franche.
A mainland company may suit actionnaires planning to:
Dubaï's official business portal provides activity searches, business-setup guidance and licensing services for mainland companies. Invest à Dubaï
Every Zone franche has its own activity list, company regulations, share-transfer rules, capital requirements, office packages and formation documents.
The actionnaires should not choose a jurisdiction solely because it offers the lowest first-year price.
Before discussing share percentages, the fondateurs should agree on the business itself.
They should define:
Different expectations about the business model can create conflict even when the shareholding is clearly documented.
For example, one founder may expect a consulting business with low overheads, while another plans to import products, maintain inventory and hire employees. These models have different capital, licensing, banking and risk requirements.
The actionnaires must determine how the company's ownership will be divided.
Ownership percentages should reflect more than friendship, job title or who first proposed the idea.
Relevant contributions can include:
The value of non-cash contributions should be assessed carefully. An informal promise to bring customers is not equivalent to paid capital unless it is defined, measurable and enforceable.
Should Every Founder Receive Equal Shares?
A 50:50 company can create a deadlock if the two actionnaires disagree and neither has authority to resolve the matter.
Equal ownership may be suitable when both parties:
It may be unsuitable when one founder:
Ownership should be commercially reasoned rather than chosen merely to avoid a difficult discussion.
Share capital represents the amount attributed to the actionnaires' ownership interests in the company's constitutional documents.
The parties should agree:
Government capital requirements vary by legal form, business activity, regulator and jurisdiction.
Even when the licensing authority does not demand a substantial deposit, the business still needs enough working capital to operate.
Fondateurs frequently provide money in two different ways:
An equity contribution forms part of the shareholder's investment in the company. It does not ordinarily become repayable like a conventional loan.
A shareholder loan is money advanced to the company under documented repayment terms.
The actionnaires should record:
Poorly documented transfers between actionnaires and the company can cause disputes, accounting problems and tax questions.
The actionnaires should decide what happens when the company requires more money.
Possible approaches include:
Important questions include:
Are actionnaires legally required to provide more funds?
What happens if one contributes and another refuses?
Does additional funding increase ownership?
Will the contributing shareholder receive a loan balance?
Can outside investors be admitted?
Which approvals are required?
Can ownership be diluted?
Is there a pre-emption right?
A founder may receive a large ownership percentage in exchange for working in the company. If that founder leaves after a short period, the remaining actionnaires may be left operating the business while the departed founder retains the full interest.
A vesting arrangement can make ownership subject to:
The enforceability and implementation of such arrangements require proper legal drafting within the chosen EAU structure.
The actionnaires should determine who will handle:
Each role should have:
A shareholder who works full-time and a passive investor should not be treated as if they perform the same operational function.
A shareholder owns an interest in the company. A manager has authority to conduct company affairs within the powers granted.
A shareholder is not automatically entitled to:
These powers depend on the company's constitutional documents, manager appointment, corporate resolutions and bank mandates.
The manager may be:
The actionnaires should decide what the manager may do without further approval.
Day-to-day powers may include:
An excessively narrow manager mandate can paralyse operations. An unlimited mandate can expose actionnaires to unmanaged risk.
Ownership percentage and voting control are often connected, but the applicable documents and legal framework must clearly establish the arrangement.
The actionnaires should decide:
The Commercial Companies framework and the company's constitutional documents govern formal decision-making. Bespoke arrangements should be reviewed by qualified legal counsel.
Reserved matters are major decisions that cannot be made by one manager or ordinary majority without specified shareholder approval.
They may include:
Reserved matters can protect investors, but an excessively long list can make normal business decisions unnecessarily slow.
A minority shareholder may be unable to control an ordinary vote. Appropriate protections can therefore be considered.
Possible protections include:
Minority protection should not create a blanket veto over routine operations.
They may need provisions addressing:
A balanced structure protects investment without making the company unmanageable.
The Mémorandum d'association or equivalent constitutional document is a fundamental company document.
The document must comply with mandatory EAU law and licensing-authority requirements.
A standard authority template may be sufficient for a simple business relationship. It may not capture every commercial agreement between fondateurs.
A actionnaires' agreement is a private contract intended to govern the relationship among actionnaires.
The agreement should be coordinated with the Mémorandum d'association and mandatory EAU law. Conflicting documents can create uncertainty.
Qualified legal advice is particularly important for customised shareholder arrangements.
Shareholders should agree on the distinction between:
A shareholder who works in the business may receive remuneration for services as well as returns on ownership. A passive shareholder may receive distributions without drawing a salary.
The EAU Commercial Companies framework prohibits the distribution of fictitious profits. Distributions must be supported by the company's lawful financial position and properly approved. EAU Legislation – Commercial Companies Law
Questions to settle include:
How much profit will be retained?
How much may be distributed?
How often will distributions be considered?
What cash reserve must remain?
Must debts and taxes be paid first?
Who approves distributions?
Are audited or approved accounts required?
Will expansion take priority over dividends?